Thursday, July 17, 2008

Chemistry of Relationships


This is written during the end of my LOOO......ONG summer holidays when I'm sitting here without doing the project work I'm supposed to do...this shall be my last write up about Chemistry I have " tried" to learn so far and I have made up my mind to forget it after writing this...

Disclaimer : This might seem very uninteresting for most of the people..so far I have been writing posts for the sake of blogging...but this is something that I have realized myself in the recent days and may not suit some of the personalities reading this blog....I just wanted to write and so I'm writing

In my 6th standard one of my teacher told about praying to God in a circular fashion. That is ..where you first pray for yourself (self centered concentric circles...) , then for your dear ones say parents, siblings, dear friends, friends, people whom you are acquainted with..and for your enemies (positive or negative depends on the person...:P )... The circle expands ... just like the ripples formed on a water surface originated by a falling drop expands.... No...If you think I'm going to say something regarding God you are mistaken...and of course the title does not suggest that too...

What is obvious from this circle is the closer a person to you, the smaller the circle he/she is in. The smaller the circle he/she is in....the more the priority you give to that particular person. Person treated by you in a particular same way shall be in a particular circle. The virtual distance between you and the person shall be the radius of the circle the person is.

I do not intend to make 'Mokka'...but you might feel this comparison of the above mentioned circle with the structure of an atom is... :

Consider yourself as the nucleus of the atom and all other persons as electrons around you. Sticking to the classical Bohr's model, the circle represents the electron orbits. Transitions happen often..but in the case of relationships there is no quantisation. The transition might be continuous or discrete. But the atom has to spend some of its energy for it ..it might be some thing as simple as a smile or a talk or as valuable as your time and heart...

Consider now the other person being the nucleus in his own set of concentric circles. The relationship between these two persons can be considered as the chemical bond that forms between the two atoms. The criterion for bond -relationship formation is that one person should be in the circle of the other and vice versa.

Quantum chemistry says a strong bond is formed when the electron in one energy jumps into the orbital of the other atom of same energy level. That was the reason told for the order of strength of back-bonding among halogens. Dissimilar energy levels do not form the strongest possible bond. In binary language of molecular orbital theory , bonding is formed if orbitals of same sign overlap...dissimilar orbital overlap causes repulsion. Stability is present in case of similarity Isn't it interesting to find that the same holds true for relationships also ?

Whatever might be the relationship between you and the other , it will last long only if both of you are in the circles of the other with same radius. The person may be your close friend or just a 'Hi-Bye' friend. This is the important lesson I have learnt
: When the persons are in circles of different radius, then one will expect more from the other and the other will not live upto his/her expectations. This will cause the relationship to break. It is better not to be close than breaking a close relationship, right ?. So keep persons at a distance in which they keep you at. Any discrepancy in this will cause problems in the relationship.

Some of the circles might accomodate any number of people ...say the number of friends we have, keeps on increasing and they get accomodated either in any of the existing circles or create a new one of their own. But as this happens there is a chance of that circle getting expanded which means all the persons in that circle get farther away from you..:(... But there might be some relation that will always remain close to you ...consistently...unshakably...a relationship which belonged to a circle, where it remained as one among the many to the one which is the smallest of all..staying unique throughout both of their lives...people call this relationship as LOVE.

Just like there is lot of electronic repulsion in the compact sized 2p orbital of the Fluorine atom, this circle is even more smaller to adopt two persons at the same time. One person being in that circle forces out any other person entering into that circle. This interelectron repulsion is called as POSSESIVENESS by non-technical people. Before I forget I want you to remind you that F-F bond is stronger than any other F-X bond. This is again because both the persons treat the other in the same way and very closely. The common name for F-X bond is one -sided love.

Here every atom is a radio-active one. Anyone might get disintegrated anytime. Some live long...some don't. But as long as one lives, live with proper configuration. That is what I wanted to say..no.. think of. External influences never matter some of the internal properties like the radioactivity. So unless you realise this from the bottom of your heart, this won't make sense no matter what I say.

20 comments:

Unknown said...

Awesome Arun.. So in which energy level do i fall ?

adithi said...

very interesting analogy drawn..[:)]

Kashyap Puranik said...

machcha stud da. seriously where do u get all your ideas man. U r really really creative. superb man, but reread your blog and take care of some very very small changes and ya change your blog name to what its all about+your name by 2 or may be sqrt(abov*abov). that ll make the blog catchy.
plz gimme some f your creativity, my blog really really needs it.
and I shall advertise your blog in my profile.

Abhijit Kiran said...

Dude, why in the world do you want to put relations under chemistry???? Doesn't this world have enough of chemistry as it is already? Don't make a heavy subject heavier :D lol

Arun said...

Since there were some misunderstanding and controversies regarding the statement explaining LOVE... I wanted to explain it by quoting a forward message I got once . It says " Love is...when Grandma is unable to paint her toes as she can't bend, Grandpa paints her toe inspite of his back pain". That is the LOVE mentioned. That is the true love. No misconceptions please...:)

AKILA said...

hey this makes a lot of sense...
there is this commonly used "he's in my inner circle" to refer to a close friend or relative..
Nicely written.
And well done on the title. Can't think of a more apt title for a post about the chemistry between people [;)]

phani kishan said...

dude!!!! :O

Arun said...

@Akila : So who is in ur inner circle ???...[:P]

@Phani : Could be more generous in commenting dude..!!

AKILA said...

:D :P i'm just an electron at different energy levels in different atoms.. ive got no circles of my own ..

Arun said...

@Akila :
No way...do you mean to say you have got no relationships at all.. you can hide the circle from us..but not from your own conscience... [:P]

Vikranth said...

hiii

i am toooooo weaaak in chemistry to actually comment on this post in my own way...that is the way i intend to do...

any ways, AWWESOME WORK DA...
where do u get these analogies out da....

AKILA said...

conscience is a very painful thing [:D].. (hope you dont mind my littering your comments [;)])

Arun said...

@Akila.. Not at all..Im happy that my comments count increasing...lol

sporadicradical said...

analogies are stud.
are stars in the binary star system also in love? [:P]

Naveen said...

Wow! A Really good correlation! :-)
You might be interesting in the Ising Models for further research in this topic :-D

But, you forgot one thing. The inherent quantum effects within an atom.
This also holds true in your analogy. The position of a person in in your group of friends(I am not talking about financial status or any of that crap here) is not constant. Whenever someone comes and tries to observe his/her position, it almost certainly changes. There you go! One of the many examples of how your analogy is quantum mechanically true :-)

I think this is enough phart for one comment :-)

Keep those posts coming :-)

vaibhav said...

Good one!! I would like to extend the bond theory of relations here [continuation of ur paper :)]...
Well,
'Friendship' is like a covalent bond where each participant has to share equally.

'Love' is like ionic bond where one the person has to accommodate other... mean ready to sacrifice for lover.

'Hi-bye' friends are like Metallic bonds. People belong to this category are least bounded.


Good Arun .. keep on blogging!

Sivaramakrishnan said...

hey... very profound thoughts da.. [:)]
but, like the acid test for any theory, can you make any predictions.. ?? [:P]
check my blog for my reasons against this theory and my theory for the observations (coming very soon...)

@arun: this is my style of marketing [;)]

All the same, the post was very interesting & thought provoking...
a very good piece of research hypothesis... i think u should publish this. [:D]
keep it up... i'd love to read more such stuff..[:)]
ps: da grandma & grandpa love quote was lovely [:)]

Boneywasawarriorwayayix said...

nice read :)
profound!!

ramya said...

wow! dude where do u get all these co-relations! studd ra....
keep blogging

Unknown said...

That was really stud maxx...awesome..